 | | Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images
|
| Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) No, he's just adjusting to being a New Englander... Todd, you need to do better than that though, that's a poor example of double negativese. Frank (24 years ago, 18-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images
|
| (...) Hey, it wasn't supposed to not be unconfusing, it was just not supposed to not necessarily make sense. :) (My favorite double-negativese is still "Duuuude...Most non-non-heinous!") --Todd (24 years ago, 18-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images
|
| Frank Filz <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote in article <Fq3tKE.9sx@lugnet.com>... (...) in (...) Well, in my case, Todd gave me the best laugh I've had today. I suspect he knows his double negatives better than that. :) Thanks Todd. Regards, Allan (24 years ago, 18-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images
|
| (...) Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure. And I beleive it was, "Dude! That was most non... non-non... non-heinous!" :D Hmm. Actually, now that I think about it, it may have been in Bogus Journey. eric (24 years ago, 18-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images
|
| (...) Not to start a flame war, but I think those are great examples negatives. Maybe not no simple double negatives, but great negatives none the less. :) Mark (24 years ago, 19-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Double Negativese (was Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images)
|
| Ice wrote in message <38AEC563.B2C84529@i...ve.com>... (...) in (...) Well, I have to admit that I'm way out of practice having been out of New England for almost 10 years now, but what I remember and grew up on were double negatives which were (...) (24 years ago, 19-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
