 | | Re: Meta-Legends?
|
| "Paul Hanson" <paul.hanson@latitude.com> wrote in message news:H659v3.B0w@lugnet.com... (...) it's (...) happen. (...) parts (...) What about people who want to see a space set from a different year of issue? I'd say that depending on the year, (...) (24 years ago, 26-Nov-02, to lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: Meta-Legends?
|
| (...) And I wasn't trying to be hyper-critical about it not being practical, just trying to provide some constructive feedback. :) (...) Actually, I wouldn't say it's not well-thought-out. I would say it's a solid core idea that would someday need (...) (24 years ago, 26-Nov-02, to lugnet.market.theory)
| | | | | Re: Meta-Legends?
|
| (...) I never said that my idea was a practical one :-) It's just a not-very-well-thought-out idea based on the realization that some of the gigantic new <sets> have more pieces individually than some of the beloved <themes> of old. (...) I agree (...) (24 years ago, 26-Nov-02, to lugnet.market.theory)
| | | | | Re: Meta-Legends?
|
| (...) Paul, I will give this one an 'A' for originality and innovation. But I have to disagree that it would make for a good practical solution. Here's my reasoning: 1) Some folks may only be interested in one or two particular sets from the entire (...) (24 years ago, 25-Nov-02, to lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: Meta-Legends?
|
| (...) If you do all that, you could be sure you won't have to bother about your (former) girlfriend. The main problem would be the lego storage problem. Regards, Michael (24 years ago, 25-Nov-02, to lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
|
