| |
I agree the lawyer route is defiantly not the way to go.
However, if they admittedly made the mistake, meaning they were not hacked
of screwed by a disgruntled employee, they should have offered a more
generous compensation. Ten percent off of a sale isn't worth its weight in
shipping. Even 20 or 50% would have made the error more forgivable.
-Nick
(a not so impressed would be consumer)
Larry Pieniazek wrote in message <3843EA8F.2FC10BBA@voyager.net>...
> Paul Mison wrote:
>
> > Good luck, but I doubt they'll honour the orders- but with some of the
> > Americans I've seen on the previous thread, I'd be surprised if there
> > wasn't a legal battle brewing here too. (Insert smiley here.)
>
> It's pretty clear now that this was an honest mistake(1). Anyone that I
> *like* won't push the point. The Entertainer has offered 10% off on an
> order to make up for it, from what I hear, although I have not yet
> received a reply to my inquiry, or a "sorry about that" note in reply to
> my order.
>
> But you're right about some people perhaps wheeling lawyers in.
>
> If anyone is listening and contemplating that, I respectfully request
> that you not.
>
> (1) - although I stand behind my comments that there may have been a
> legitimate reason for lowering the prices on some items to the point of
> almost giving them away.
>
> --
> Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
> - - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
> fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
>
> NOTE: Soon to be lpieniazek@tsisoft.com :-)
|
|
Message has 4 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
163 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
