 | | Re: Blue Hopper Car Mania... —Mike Stanley
| | | | Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote: (sorry for not removing .uk before now) (...) I agree. I just see the end result as being no different than if I had one shipped to work. But that's the funny thing about morals - we bend ourselves around (...) (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Blue Hopper Car Mania... —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | | (...) I have no idea. I'd happily split hairs with you on this but we've gone below the power of my scope to resolve, hairsizewise... :-) (25 years ago, 12-Nov-99, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Blue Hopper Car Mania... —James Brown
| | | | | | | (...) You mean you can't come to a resolution, or are you simply not focused enough? James (URL) (25 years ago, 12-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Blue Hopper Car Mania... —Jasper Janssen
| | | | | (...) Wouldn't this depend on the type of roommate situation? I'd say, if the only thing they have in common is the address, than sure, separate households. If they have a private room in the house, but share living quarters, then they're not. (...) (25 years ago, 17-Nov-99, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | |
