 | | Re: Is LEGO considered a 'collectable' for insurance claims ? —David Laswell
|
| | | (...) Sounds reasonable to me. If it's a collectible, the packaging affects its value, based both on condition and rarity. If it's not a collectible, the packaging is just meant to contain and protect the product until you're ready to remove the (...) (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.market.shipping)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Is LEGO considered a 'collectable' for insurance claims ? —Ray Sanders
|
| | | | (...) Which kinda goes back to my basic question... What makes one LEGO set 'collectable' and another not ? Is it age ? Is it appreciation above MSRP ? Is it availability ? Is it box condition ? Is it desireability ? Other than age, most of those (...) (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.market.shipping)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Is LEGO considered a 'collectable' for insurance claims ? —David Laswell
|
| | | | (...) The only valid answer to that is "collectors". (...) It does make something of a difference, but Galidor figures came out around the same time, and I doubt any of them have appreciated in value above MSRP. (...) You've got cause and effect (...) (20 years ago, 25-Aug-04, to lugnet.market.shipping, lugnet.market.appraisal)
|
| | | | |
