 | | Does TLC act when we point out infringements of their trademark here? —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | (...) The case of the bootleg-clone seller may be instructive here. I don't know why he was suspended/de-registered, but given that we know TLC members read LUGNET off and on, is it at all possible that when we flag these questionable uses of (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-02, to lugnet.market.services)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Does TLC act when we point out infringements of their trademark here? —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) Actually, if TLC wanted to be serious, they probably should force eBay to change the category name to something other than LEGO, or force eBay to police it for non-LEGO. The way the category is being used, one could make a good argument that (...) (22 years ago, 28-May-02, to lugnet.market.services)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Does TLC act when we point out infringements of their trademark here? —Mark Papenfuss
|
| | | | | (...) True, but on the flipside Ebay does use many copyrighted names as category names. And Lego knows that Lego sales on Ebay promotes their product, and that equals free advertising - no company would let that go. Also people who choose the Lego (...) (22 years ago, 28-May-02, to lugnet.market.services)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Does TLC act when we point out infringements of their trademark here? —Kevin Wilson
|
| | | | Frank Filz wrote in message <3CF2E41E.D7C01185@m...ng.com>... (...) They take it seriously enough that one Guild of Bricksmiths(tm) member had a message from eBay saying that using LEGO in his listing titles for custom sets was keyword spamming. He (...) (22 years ago, 28-May-02, to lugnet.market.services)
|
| | | | |
