 | | Re: paper jambalaya? —Kevin Wilson
|
| | | I'd be interested but I think it might rapidly get expensive postage-wise. Paper is darned heavy! Kevin (25 years ago, 16-Nov-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: paper jambalaya? —Matthew Wilkins
|
| | | | | (...) cheaper than First Class or Priority Mail. -Cheese (25 years ago, 16-Nov-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: paper jambalaya? —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | I agree, it will get very expensive VERY fast. (...) Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay Area DSMs (25 years ago, 17-Nov-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: paper jambalaya? —Susan Hoover
|
| | | | (...) What if we artificially limit it by keeping the box small? I think I will experiment and see how many of various sizes of catalogs (single sheet, in-box, S@H) I can get into a 3-pound package. [later] I haven't experimented yet, but usps.gov (...) (25 years ago, 17-Nov-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: paper jambalaya? —Dave Jost
|
| | | | Hello all... I would be interested as well.... and I agree.. keep the box under 2 lbs or the page weight thing that was laid out by Kevin and you either split it or hold back the remainder that are either duplicates or of little interest...??? This (...) (25 years ago, 22-Nov-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | |
