Subject:
|
Re: paper jambalaya?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.jambalaya
|
Date:
|
Wed, 17 Nov 1999 17:22:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
365 times
|
| |
|
|
Tom Stangl, VFAQman wrote:
> I agree, it will get very expensive VERY fast.
>
> Kevin Wilson wrote:
> >
> > I'd be interested but I think it might rapidly get expensive
> > postage-wise. Paper is darned heavy!
What if we artificially limit it by keeping the box small? I think I
will experiment and see how many of various sizes of catalogs (single
sheet, in-box, S@H) I can get into a 3-pound package.
[later] I haven't experimented yet, but usps.gov says that a 3-pound
package costs $2.08 to send domestically via "Special Standard Mail
(Book Rate)", and that there are about 6 sheets of paper to the ounce.
That means we should be able to send 288 sheets, or 48 in-box catalogs,
for $2.08. Subtract a few catalogs to make up for the packaging.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: paper jambalaya?
|
| Hello all... I would be interested as well.... and I agree.. keep the box under 2 lbs or the page weight thing that was laid out by Kevin and you either split it or hold back the remainder that are either duplicates or of little interest...??? This (...) (25 years ago, 22-Nov-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
Message is in Reply To:
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
