 | | Re: The Sad State of Minifig Box #1
|
|
(...) I am relieved to hear this. I, mistakenly, thought that someone had taken good condition pieces and replaced them with the "many old, beat up, missing lots of parts type torsos". My faith in the participants of Jambalaya is restored. (25 years ago, 1-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| |
| | Re: The Sad State of Minifig Box #1
|
|
My thoughts on MFB1 and the general state of things. When this box left me (after Todd gave me the stuff to partition as I see fit) it had a lot of very beat up minifigs. The debate swirled around what to do with it. I had already put some minifigs (...) (25 years ago, 2-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| |
| | Re: The Sad State of Minifig Box #1
|
|
(...) Chris is not necessarily to blame for that situation with his original box - the one Tammy is not tracking. I probably am, as I more than doubled the weight of the box, and some of that doubling was in basic bricks. But I put a lot of other (...) (25 years ago, 2-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| |
| | Re: The Sad State of Minifig Box #1
|
|
(...) I forgot to sign that... Paul Sinasohn, in Oakland. (25 years ago, 2-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
