 | | Re: New Ideas for Jambalaya - anyone interested? —Steve Bliss
| | | | My thinking is that the person with the box only has to follow the one rule they choose. At that point in the receive-trade-send cycle, they are just dealing with the (potential) mess other people have left. So the current box-holder shouldn't have (...) (25 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: New Ideas for Jambalaya - anyone interested? —Christopher L. Weeks
| | | | | (...) I'm not sure I follow. Do you mean for any given piece that is removed from the box, you must only choose one rule that affects what you do? What about in the scenario Paul brought up later in the thread? How would that be resolved in your (...) (25 years ago, 23-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: New Ideas for Jambalaya - anyone interested? —Steve Bliss
| | | | | (...) No, I mean that when you receive the box, you pick one rule from the "active list", and conduct a trade based on that rule. Then you cross out that rule, and add a new rule to the end of the list. So if you picked a rule "take slopes, and (...) (25 years ago, 23-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
| | | | | | |
