Subject:
|
Re: Technic Box #1 update
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.jambalaya
|
Date:
|
Sat, 26 Feb 2000 02:31:28 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
wattsup1@earthlink.net=stopspammers=
|
Viewed:
|
696 times
|
| |
|
|
Thanks for the update Mark.
I felt the same way when I had the box and saw the broken bits. Thanks
for taking the time to seperate them into another bag and doing such a
fine job with the packaging (I'm sure Larry would be proud).
I actually did'nt find hardly anything that I wanted, but made a
contribution of some gears, wheels, instruction manuals and small beams
anyway. I wish I had seen the box after you, I would have liked to have
more of those chain links.
I say the next person (Ken) should just throw away the broken parts.
Any others agree?
-Phil Watt
Mark Haye wrote:
> Technic Box #1 is on the way to Ken Drew as of this morning.
>
> I packaged the parts in an official LEGO S@H box, with
> official LEGO S@H packing. Given that Larry P. started
> this box, it only seems fitting that LEGO purity should be
> maintained. ;-)
>
> <soapbox>
> In general, the box was mostly what I anticipated: a random
> collection of Technic parts, and I was able to make what I
> considered a fair trade. I was, however disappointed by
> finding several "defective" parts in the mix: an 8-tooth gear
> that was crushed, a 5x5 pulley on which half the center spar
> was broken off, a beam with gobs of glue/epoxy on the ends,
> various Technic figure appendages, some broken off, some
> just separated, etc. I also found some parts which, AFAIK,
> are not even LEGO, which makes them "defective" by
> definition, I guess. ;-) I'm disappointed that someone thought
> these parts were worthy of trading into a Jambalaya box.
> If these parts were in my collection, I would throw them away,
> but I couldn't bring myself to take them as part of my trade
> just to throw them away, so I separated some of the more
> obvious "defects" into another bag, labelled "junk." What I
> traded into the box was brand-new, never-been-used,
> still-in-the-perforated-bag parts (about 180 Technic chain
> links). While trading brand-new parts is certainly not
> required, I definitely think the Jambalaya boxes should
> not be used as a dumping ground for "defective" parts.
> </soapbox>
>
> --
> Mark Haye, haye (at) us (dot) ibm (dot) com
> IBM TSM Server Development, Tucson, AZ
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Technic Box #1 update
|
| "Phil Watt" <wattsup1@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:38B73B00.B5E5C4...ink.net... (...) <snip> (...) <snipage.> (...) <snip> I also was dissapointed by the broken bits, but left them in thinking that maybe if someone has an "off the wall" (...) (25 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Technic Box #1 update
|
| Technic Box #1 is on the way to Ken Drew as of this morning. I packaged the parts in an official LEGO S@H box, with official LEGO S@H packing. Given that Larry P. started this box, it only seems fitting that LEGO purity should be maintained. ;-) (...) (25 years ago, 26-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
