| |
James Brown wrote:
>
> <follow-up set to off-topic.debate)
>
> Umm, without meaning to get involved, I trust that the posting of private
> e-mail to a (nominally) public new-group was in error, yes?
I certainly did not give permission to do so and I believe that posting
email without permission should be, and IS, a violation of LUGNET terms
of use (from the Discussion groups terms of use, see
http://www.lugnet.com/terms/) specifically:
6. Post or transmit any information, software, or other material
which violates or infringes upon the rights of others, including
material which is an invasion of privacy or publicity rights or
which is protected by copyright, trademark, or other proprietary
right, or derivative works with respect thereto, without first
obtaining permission from the owner or right holder.
This is an adminstrative issue. Hence I've copied admin.general, and not
off-topic.debate.
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: THE LAST WORD
|
| (...) Absolutely. I originally set follow-up to .debate because of the potential for controversy or flames. I didn't make it an adminstrative issue becuase I try to give the benefit of the doubt, and suggested it might be in error, and offered a (...) (25 years ago, 9-Feb-99, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: THE LAST WORD
|
| <follow-up set to off-topic.debate) Umm, without meaning to get involved, I trust that the posting of private e-mail to a (nominally) public new-group was in error, yes? You should delete the mis-posted article, if so. Kurt Eilers writes: <snipped (...) (25 years ago, 9-Feb-99, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
