 | | Re: Wish List —James Cunningham
|
| | | (...) 300 (...) a "little (...) If (...) to (...) Well, Sir, I appologize that you find my request as an insult. But, I am very open to negotiation over how much the set would sell for as I do recognize the fact that some are very old sets. I wold (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jun-00, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Wish List —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) James: I can't speak for Dave... but I certainly wasn't *insulted* by your request. Merely bemused. I posted my reply in hopes of helping you better understand the marketplace. Rare old town sets are expensive. That's just the way it is. And (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jun-00, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Wish List —Geoffrey Hyde
|
| | | | | | Larry Pieniazek <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:Fw93r9.8yu@lugnet.com... (...) may (...) more (...) just (...) of the (...) doesn't (...) have (...) ...and (...) Yes, but if you go back and reread my post, I said SOME of the sets. (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jun-00, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Wish List —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) No, actually, what you said was this: (...) and that's not a statement I can agree with. If a set is "difficult to obtain" expecting to pay just MSRP++ is unrealistic. So is using it as a trade value. If you still want to quibble, name a (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jun-00, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Wish List —Dave Johann
|
| | | | (...) Ok, ok....so I came off a wee bit harder than I meant to. I meant to come across as pointing out that MSRP (or below) on the recent sets is fine, but when you are talking about sets older than 5 years, 200-500% of MSRP may factor into the (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jun-00, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | | |
