| | Re: Looking for Set # 3225 John Neal
|
| | Dave- Take it from me who purchased 44 of the 3225s to part out-- don't waste your hard earned money. The set doesn't have many (if any) remarkable pieces and just about anyone could create a better MOC. You could even build one from common bricks (...) (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.trains)
|
| | |
| | | | Re: Looking for Set # 3225 Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) I am not sure I agree that 3225 is a waste of money. If we assume that Dean doesn't have any 9V at all, or very little, but that he will get the track and controller another way (perhaps in 4561 or in 4565, or used on the resale market) 3225 (...) (25 years ago, 25-May-00, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Looking for Set # 3225 John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Oh, don't get me wrong-- I think it's a *great* deal for parts....I *did* buy 44 of them. All I meant was that he shouldn't buy the set for the engine and the cars, because they are really weak *models*. I meant to suggest that if he really (...) (25 years ago, 25-May-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Looking for Set # 3225 Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) Of course you probably think any TLC model is weak since they aren't 8 wide :-) (...) In 8 wide? :-) (25 years ago, 25-May-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Looking for Set # 3225 John Neal
|
| | | | (...) lol Well, no, but they could be a lot *better* 8 wide;-) But that engine from the 3225 is lame. Even my 10 year old son builds engines light years ahead of that thing. (...) Or 14 wide; whichever. -John (...) (25 years ago, 25-May-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |