 | | Re: Shop at home? —Sarah Heacock
|
| | | (...) Aren't footnotes supposed to come AFTER the thing they are footnoting? Sarah Heacock sarah@eskimo.com (26 years ago, 23-Oct-98, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Shop at home? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Yes but I got some flamage on RTL for putting footnotes after my signature. In the case of footnoting the sig itself, there is a conflict. So I decided that there's a precedence order to the rules, and what RTLers want is more important than (...) (26 years ago, 24-Oct-98, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Shop at home? —Sarah Heacock
|
| | | | (...) I would not call that flamage. And besides, I LIKE the footnotes after the signature. After all, on research papers, footnotes go BELOW the end of the page. Not above it. (...) Except that putting what a footnote means before it is used is all (...) (26 years ago, 24-Oct-98, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Shop at home? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) This whole footnote thing started mostly as a joke, and now it's getting out of hand. You're catching me in inconsistencies! Augh. OK: (2) footnote 0 is 0 because it refers to something from another append so the footnote anchor isn't visible (...) (26 years ago, 25-Oct-98, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | | |
