| |
On Sat, 24 Oct 1998 03:06:00 GMT, "Larry Pieniazek"
<lpien@NOSPAM.ctp.com> wrote:
> Yes but I got some flamage on RTL for putting footnotes after my signature. In
I would not call that flamage. And besides, I LIKE the footnotes after
the signature. After all, on research papers, footnotes go BELOW the
end of the page. Not above it.
> the case of footnoting the sig itself, there is a conflict. So I decided that
> there's a precedence order to the rules, and what RTLers want is more important
> than conventional usage (1).
Except that putting what a footnote means before it is used is all out
of standard usage.
> 0 - the cigs only have one $, not 2. (2)
You never tell us what footnote 2 is.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Shop at home?
|
| (...) This whole footnote thing started mostly as a joke, and now it's getting out of hand. You're catching me in inconsistencies! Augh. OK: (2) footnote 0 is 0 because it refers to something from another append so the footnote anchor isn't visible (...) (28 years ago, 25-Oct-98, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Shop at home?
|
| (...) Yes but I got some flamage on RTL for putting footnotes after my signature. In the case of footnoting the sig itself, there is a conflict. So I decided that there's a precedence order to the rules, and what RTLers want is more important than (...) (28 years ago, 24-Oct-98, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
