 | | Re: Proxy ratcheting: How do auction systems work?
|
|
Mike Stanley wrote: <snip> (...) Mike very succinctly said what I intended to say in a much more long winded way. My point exactly. I think percentage bumps are a great option but I would also like to see dollar amounts allowed too. Or even both on (...) (25 years ago, 25-Apr-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: The Gary Louie Memorial Auction
|
|
We're up to (lucky) 21 lots, with another emotionally significant lot, donated by Russell Clark, a LegoLand Ambassador keychain. (URL) of good deals on lots yet, and the amount of money we're going to raise is VERY impressive. Thanks to all bidders (...) (25 years ago, 25-Apr-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Auction: Train sets 4564 and 4555
|
|
Hello! I have one used 4564 Freight Express and one new 4555 Container Depot for auction. Auction starts today. #1 4564 Freight Express (1994) Open #2 4555 Container Depot (1995) Open DESCRIPTIONS: Item #1 4564 Freight Express (1994) Used. No box. (...) (25 years ago, 25-Apr-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: Proxy ratcheting: How do auction systems work?
|
|
(...) That is good to know. So the sellers can shoot themselves in the foot if they're selling high dollar items or they can be smart, but the system doesn't force them to do one thing or the other. I still think making buyers happy is as important (...) (25 years ago, 25-Apr-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: Proxy ratcheting: How do auction systems work?
|
|
(...) Hrmmm, I'm coming in late here, so I'll probably say something and find 10 people who say the same thing later in the thread. Sure, the sellers pay the fees. But if the bidding increments are so high that they repeatedly scare off or prevent (...) (25 years ago, 25-Apr-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: Proxy ratcheting: How do auction systems work?
|
|
(...) I have to admit that I have jumped into bidding when items his G2 before, but I never thought of it as sniping. Many times there are lots that I am interested in, but don't really have the time or the inclination to deal with the nickel and (...) (25 years ago, 25-Apr-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Update 4/24/99 pm: Pirate Auction
|
|
Hello all, Well, That's all folks. Thanks to all who participated. Current bids: 725 Osvaldo Fernandez $40 Sold 6289 Alex Eulen $100 Sold 6289 Otis Anderson $100 Sold 6289 Frank Filz $110 Sold 6263 Frank Filz $22 Sold 6263 Pat Shepard $22 Sold 6263 (...) (25 years ago, 25-Apr-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: Methodology: Reserve, Controlled Reserve, or No Reserve?
|
|
I understand why sellers like reserves, but as a buyer (1) I'd prefer that they were banned, limited, or cost the seller a lot of money to do. If the listing fee is 50 cents, charge 20% of the reserve whether the item sells or not. Plus 5 bucks to (...) (25 years ago, 25-Apr-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: Methodology: Reserve, Controlled Reserve, or No Reserve?
|
|
(...) Definitely 4. 2 and 3 make no sense whatsoever -- reserves don't work unless they are secret. 1 just sucks, as has been described in this thread already. Steve (25 years ago, 24-Apr-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: Methodology: Reserve, Controlled Reserve, or No Reserve?
|
|
(...) And the potential to make bidders *EXTREMELY* violently angry. Imagine if you lost out on something because your high bid of $110 was $15 less than the secret reserve price, and you held off on bidding on the same item in another auction (...) (25 years ago, 24-Apr-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
