 | | Re: Proxy ratcheting: How do auction systems work?
|
|
(...) No, that was my second statement -- <grin> -- it was posted two minutes after the first one, quoted above. (...) It's especially tricky sometimes to read what's going on when there are multiple identical copies of lots. (...) A keeps it under (...) (25 years ago, 20-Apr-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Glen's Assorted Lego Auction - 4/19 Update
|
|
*** All items are now "Going 1". If no new bids are received, the auction will progress ever 2 week days until "Sold". If new bids are recieved, they will progress to "Going 1" after two days of no new bids. Next progression will be on Tuesday (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: Proxy ratcheting: How do auction systems work?
|
|
(...) Good. (note that this is clearer than your first statement "AucZILLA works the 'correct'<emphasis mine> way" :-) ) I was getting myself into a panic for nothing, I must have been misreading the results I was examining. What about Derick's (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: Proxy ratcheting: How do auction systems work?
|
|
(...) AucZILLA works the correct way. (...) Yup, that's correct. --Todd (25 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: Proxy ratcheting: How do auction systems work?
|
|
(...) In the AucZILLA system, the lot is awarded to A (not B) for 13, because A's bid of 13 came in first. (...) Yes. (...) AucZILLA gives priority to the earlier of two equal bids, regardless of automatic increments. It would go to A for 13, not to (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
