|
|
 | | Re: Gats in St. Louis
|
| (...) suprised. (...) June (...) I like this too. I think it would bring new members. And I don’t think we need to big of a layout right a way it might be better to start small and work our way up. (...) module. (...) suprised (...) This sounds like (...) (26 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.loc.us.mo)
| | | | | Re: Gats in St. Louis
|
| (...) Either one works for me. I began my acent from my dark ages about a year and a half ago, and just got interested in trains about 6 months ago. I havn't made up any decent MOC's yet. (I'm still waiting to get a new place for my collection. I (...) (26 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.loc.us.mo)
| | | | | Re: Gats in St. Louis
|
| Levering A. Reynolds wrote in message ... (...) (no (...) I haven't built anything in 8 wide yet, but that doesn't matter, since I want to build new stuff for this project anyway. You guys can decide about the scaling, just let me know. Maybe we (...) (26 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.loc.us.mo)
| | | | | Re: Gats in St. Louis
|
| (...) Deffinetly 8 or even 10 studs for tunnels (...) to (...) I think we can modify the table with support underneath to carry any weight. I have been trying to find another show ether GATS or something else, Toy show etc. I think if we could have (...) (26 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.loc.us.mo)
| | | | | Re: Gats in St. Louis
|
| (...) The only real difference is clearances on tunnels and that sort of thing. (no point in tearing up a whole section to move a row of bricks by one stud. I havn't looked at that table page in awhile, I guess I need to take a look at it again. My (...) (26 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.loc.us.mo)
|
|
