| |
In lugnet.org.us, Eric Kingsley writes:
> You can count on me for some. Probably not $50 but something. I actually
> would much rather do this where 20 people gave $10 instead of 4 people giving
> $50. That way it really seems like more of a community thing. (Of course
> that is using your $200 example). Besides we are really starting to get Big
> in terms of members now so I think 1. A community LEGO pool is a good idea and
> 2. I think the "community" should buy the bricks and not one or two members.
> http://www.nelug.org/
Yep, I'm definitly with you on both 1 and 2... (I'd MUCH rather pay $10 than
$50 :) ), but if we can only get, say, 16 of us to pay $10, I'd be more than
happy to put in $50 to make it happen... I didn't want to imply that only 4 of
us or something would be splitting the cost... (actually, I probably shouldn't
even have started quoting figures, my bad) But if we have a sufficient amount
of people interested, I'd be willing to put in more than my share (partly
thanks to the fact that I've been dealing with her already)
DaveE
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
