Subject:
|
Re: Brickish.org
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.uk
|
Date:
|
Mon, 30 Aug 2004 23:20:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3483 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.loc.uk, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.loc.uk, Steve Burge wrote:
> > www.brickish.org is working OK for me.
> >
> > Steve
> >
> > In lugnet.loc.uk, Peter Reid wrote:
> > > > Whats happening with it? I read that the domain had been incorrectly expired
> > > > before the weekend.
> > > >
> > > > Tim
> > >
> > > This is bad...I've been trying to log on all day, but no joy. We're doomed.
> > > Doomed I say.
> > >
> > > Pete
>
> I believe that "some people can get in, some can't" is a sign that some
> nameserver caches have been flushed and some haven't (or conversely, some were
> flushed and refreshed and some are still just flushed)... I would bet on the
> former because this particular machine (it is a machine at a client which surely
> has never been there before, and I daresay hadn't been to LUGNET before today
> either) can't get there, but some other machines can. But I wouldn't bet a lot.
>
> I hope that helps.
>
> Also: I hope it's back soon! I'm sadly lacking in my daily quotient of UKish
> smartypantsness, and starting to run a deficiency.
A Whois seems to imply that it is registered until next year but has only just
been updated. http://www.samspade.org/t/lookat?a=www.brickish.org
I think you're right about the DNS not having been updated yet after a flush
Tim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Brickish.org
|
| Yeah, we had problems with the renewal. I hope the .org will spring to life for all soon, but in the meantime you can try www.brickish.org.uk, www.brickish.co.uk, www.brickish.com all of which have been registered and will lead to the same place. As (...) (20 years ago, 31-Aug-04, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Brickish.org
|
| (...) I believe that "some people can get in, some can't" is a sign that some nameserver caches have been flushed and some haven't (or conversely, some were flushed and refreshed and some are still just flushed)... I would bet on the former because (...) (20 years ago, 30-Aug-04, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
