 | | Re: What little loc groups are best for —Simon Robinson
|
| | | (...) Yes, it is - but bear in mind in my case it was only a chance crossposting, and it happened quite a while after I joined lugnet. (I can't remember how long after, but you can probably easily find out by looking at the gap between when I (...) (25 years ago, 16-May-99, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: What little loc groups are best for —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) Well, the main UK group doesn't actually cover the same areas as the smaller groups -- it does geographically, to some extent -- but not topically. That is to say, the smaller groups are for super-localised discussions (where something is so (...) (25 years ago, 17-May-99, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: What little loc groups are best for —Simon Robinson
|
| | | | | | (...) Yes and yes. (...) But there's no text that even indicates the numbers are related to the sizes of the discussion groups :) (...) Ah - but what is the correct way of using the groups? If most people in a country are happy with how they are (...) (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: What little loc groups are best for —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) OK. Using the groups "correctly" or "incorrectly" is not a good word-choice then. More accurately would be "using or not using the groups to their full advantage." --Todd (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: What little loc groups are best for —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Simon, Any thoughts on how the introductory postings could be improved? Here's how message #1 starts for (just to pick one at random) Dover, Kent, England: --Todd ___...___ Welcome to lugnet.loc.uk.en.kt.dov, a LUGNET discussion group. (...) (25 years ago, 17-May-99, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What little loc groups are best for —Simon Robinson
|
| | | | (...) My own suggestion would be something like this. Roughly what I've changed is to remove the technical-looking lines and replace them by more friendly sounding information. At the same time, though, I think the info should be in the pages (...) (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
