 | | Re: UKLUG site idea —Huw Millington
|
| | | "James Stacey" <James@minifig.co.uk> wrote in message news:GHt2yG.uB@lugnet.com... (...) Yes, that looks better, but a couple of points: I don't like the olive drab and camoflage green. They don't go well with the (very nice) bricks down the side. (...) (23 years ago, 9-Aug-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: UKLUG site idea —Steffan Davies
|
| | | | | "Huw Millington" <hmillington@cix.co.uk> wrote in message news:GHtAzw.LoM@lugnet.com... (...) the (...) I agree here, the greens do look drab. How about swapping the olive green for red and the forest green for blue. That way we'd have the UK flag's (...) (23 years ago, 9-Aug-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: UKLUG site idea —James Stacey
|
| | | | :) I think the olive and green were piced out cos' they were the colours the sides of the bricks came out of in POV. I'm sure they are negotiable. as for the bricks down the side... Its a design. Its supposed to be ascetically pleasing, they dont (...) (23 years ago, 10-Aug-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: UKLUG site idea —Tony Priestman
|
| | | | On Fri, 10 Aug 2001, James Stacey (<GHto6D.80v@lugnet.com>) wrote at 06:41:16 (...) I second Huw. Perhaps it needs a bit less design and a bit more function. Aesthetes are generally minimalists. As for colours: primary good, everything else bad :-) (...) (23 years ago, 9-Aug-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| | | | |
