 | | New Civil Engineer - Lego vs Meccano debate —Tony Priestman
| | | | You're about as representative as anybody else, as there's no organisation, so go for it. Of course, I retain the right to stone you to death with BURPs if I don't like what you say :-) 'course, if we've got an official representative, we might have (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.mediawatch)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: New Civil Engineer - Lego vs Meccano debate —Simon Bennett
| | | | | (...) Thanks Tony (...) LOL! What a way to go! I'll tread carefully :) (...) Well, I'm by no means saying I'm going to officially represent us on a regular basis :) I'm not a good enough builder and despite working in Railways I don't own any train (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: New Civil Engineer - Lego vs Meccano debate —Ronan Webb
| | | | | Well, now I can say it , "You're a cheapskate, Simon. Trade MY stamps for some train kit!" Seriously, go kick some ass, Simon :)) Your buddy Ronan Simon Bennett <simon.bennett@ntlworld.com> wrote in message news:GH3or3.1nq@lugnet.com... <snip> (...) (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jul-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
| | | | | | |
