 | | Re: SCLF wants!
|
| "Jason Briscoe" <jason-shirley@brisc...rve.co.uk> wrote in message news:GCCGMw.9wH@lugnet.com... (...) I have a new station - straight through instead of terminus However, we can arrange things however we want - change it through the day. One issue (...) (23 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
| | | | | Re: SCLF wants!
|
| (...) Sounds good, I started one of these a while back, but abandonded as I am low on glass bricks. (...) Quite, but like you theres no real way I'd get my station on a table. What some people might not realise (we do as we've been there) is that (...) (23 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
| | | | | Re: SCLF wants!
|
| "Jason Briscoe" <jason-shirley@brisc...rve.co.uk> wrote in message news:GCCHwr.CID@lugnet.com... (...) in (...) My concern too. Long term I will knock together my own table with proper legs (...) that (...) even (...) queue? (...) Absolutely - the (...) (23 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
| | | | | Re: SCLF wants!
|
| (...) It sounds like I am being outnumbered here... I agree, it is looking impractical given the size of yours and Jason's stations. Huw (23 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
| | | | | Re: SCLF wants!
|
| (...) I'd prefer a loop layout on a ring of tables too Huw, as it makes the trains easier to see. Would we have enough track for two layouts? A couple of loops on tables and an end-to-end run between these two stations? If short of space, I don't (...) (23 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
| |
