 | | Re: Most useless plentiful part?
|
|
(...) Without destroying what? the pin or the sub-assembly? and doesn't that just vindicate my assertion that these parts are indeed useless. Lego Mad Steve (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: Most useless plentiful part?
|
|
(...) No, he means when you can't get in to the gap to fit a friction pin. So, you push one of these half-into the sub-assembly, then when you bring two sub-assemblies together you can just push them right through to hold it all together. This is (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: Most useless plentiful part?
|
|
(...) He should have used the word dismantling then, rather than destroying. That would have made it clearer. Steve (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: Most useless plentiful part?
|
|
(...) If one assembles, one dismantles. If one creates, one can destroy. 'To build may have to be the slow and laborious task of years. To destroy can be the thoughtless act of a single day' - Churchill Scott A (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: Most useless plentiful part?
|
|
(...) Oh good grief. Is this the sort of drivel that's going to be left if we take the trading out to another group? Right. Roll up! Roll up! Step right up! Get your lovely LEGO 'ere. How much would you expect to pay madam... Jason. (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: Most useless plentiful part?
|
|
"Jason J. Railton" <j.j.railton@cwcom.net> wrote in message news:G7zE4u.J0I@lugnet.com... (...) one (...) just (...) all (...) Thank you Jason, that is much better than my hurried at-lunchtime reply, and exactly what I meant. Huw (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
