 | | Re: Lego for sale —Lawrence Wilkes
|
| | | "Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G7yCvy.GD4@lugnet.com... (...) specific (...) would (...) Todd, I am not bothered what hierarchy this is in, as long as it exists. market.uk.auction market.uk.buy-sell-trade (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Lego for sale —Alison Pike
|
| | | | | In lugnet.loc.uk, Lawrence Wilkes writes: A simple market.uk would be fine by me and folks can then just use usual conventions of FA:, FS: etc in their headers. In fact, given the volume of traffic, then this would probably be better than having to (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Lego for sale —Lawrence Wilkes
|
| | | | | | | "Masterbuilder" <the.pikes@ntlworld.com> wrote in message news:G7z2FI.L1q@lugnet.com... (...) Wow! Thanks Masterbuilder. Perhaps I should go into politics. I propose that everything should be free and that all taxes are abolished. regards lawrence (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Lego for sale —Nicholas Allan
|
| | | | | | Sorry, but this is a "me too" post. I agree with the Right Hon. Mr. Wilkes PM KBE RSVP and PTO. Three groups would definitely be overkill, one group would work fine. I'm not sure whether we should be talking a subdivision of loc.uk; e.g. (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lego for sale —Jason J. Railton
|
| | | | (...) Hmm - placing it is a tricky issue. I don't think it needs separate auction/shopping/buy-sell-trade divisions, but if you put it as a sub-division of the existing auction/shopping/buy-sell-trade groups then that's what it would be - split. The (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | |
