Subject:
|
Re: UKLUG (Was: Re: LUG World Map 1st Version complete.)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.uk
|
Date:
|
Sat, 20 May 2000 14:42:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
477 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.loc.uk, Scott Arthur writes:
> > > What are the membership restrictions?
> >
> > Be a citizen of the UK?
>
> I'm not sure if I like the sound of this. I prefer inclusive, rather than
> exclusive, clubs. The group is called _UK_LUG but people in the the UK can't
> join? Your narrow geographical definition appears to include only Britain,
> rather than the UK. Also what do you mean by "citizen" - are overseas
> nationals living in the UK excluded?
For purely selfish reasons, I'd like inclusive too. Something like:
1) All people of <specified area> are automatically granted membership
2) Anyone else is welcome to apply, as long as they have a reason why they
should be granted membership.
I don't personally envisage a horde of unpatriotic foreigners wanting to
infiltrate UKLUG, so it might be a lot easier and friendlier to design the
system with that in mind?
Ie - if someone wants to join then is it fairly safe to assume that it would be
for mutual benefit, regardless of their location/nationality?
Richard
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: UKLUG (Was: Re: LUG World Map 1st Version complete.)
|
| (...) Yes, but both Belfast and Dublin are closer to you than Aberdeen. (...) Ian Paisley would never join that one :-) (...) on (...) I'm not sure if I like the sound of this. I prefer inclusive, rather than exclusive, clubs. The group is called (...) (25 years ago, 20-May-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
