Subject:
|
Re: J-Box Web Site Down
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.uk
|
Date:
|
Sun, 7 May 2000 13:36:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
470 times
|
| |
|
|
> Not a lot of point - the UK J-Boxes seem to have been a dismal failure IMHO,
> and the current tracking page does not reflect the recent discussion on this
> group of who has what. How can they being taking so long to go around? Are • they
> lost or are people hanging on to them? If so why? At the very least, I think
> the tracking page ought to give the date people sent the box on.
I think it has been going pretty well:
J-Box #3 The Minifig Box has been particularly successful in that it has
gone round the circuit very fast.
The only slight problem now is that myself and Alan unsubscribed from the
box, so it could do with a few more people.
LAST KNOWN STATUS: David Leese has it and will send to Chris Dee. (~1st May)
J-Box #2 I have been receiving regular update reports from J-Box #2, which
is a high quality box from my experience.
The tracking page is based on the update reports I receive, there was slight
confusion when Ian Bishop mistook #1 for #2, this has been rectified.
I suspect the Box has travelled further than the page suggests, so any update
reports gratefully received.
LAST KNOWN STATUS: Dave Till had it and sent it to Huw Millington (~6th April)
J-Box #1
LAST KNOWN STATUS: Ian Bishop had it and sent it to John Stormes.(~22nd April)
I will start putting dates on, and the site is back now and up to date:
http://web.ukonline.co.uk/liamp/jbox/tracking.html
--
Liam.
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: J-Box Web Site Down
|
| Liam Parnell <liamp@ukonline.co.uk> wrote in message news:Fu6z48.5K1@lugnet.com... (...) slight (...) update (...) April) Huw sent it on to me. I've taken out some 'old junk', left in the clones (!), and now I just need add some bits and find out (...) (24 years ago, 7-May-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
| | | Re: J-Box Web Site Down
|
| (...) April) (...) April) (...) Thanks a lot Liam for updating the tracking page, but I don't think the minifig box had gone round _very_ fast. Jason received it from me on 18Feb., and 10 weeks later it has still only gone another three stages - I (...) (24 years ago, 7-May-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
| | | Re: J-Box Web Site Down
|
| (...) Affirmative. Well, 25th April actually, then Parcel Farce took their usual millennium to transport it. John reports he has it OK now though. Ian Bishop, Ayrshire, UK (24 years ago, 9-May-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: J-Box Web Site Down
|
| (...) Not a lot of point - the UK J-Boxes seem to have been a dismal failure IMHO, and the current tracking page does not reflect the recent discussion on this group of who has what. How can they being taking so long to go around? Are they lost or (...) (24 years ago, 6-May-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
