Subject:
|
Re: J box update - then there were Five!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.uk
|
Date:
|
Thu, 30 Mar 2000 11:33:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1644 times
|
| |
|
|
Richard Franks <spontificus@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Fs6K5z.447@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.loc.uk, Ian Bishop writes:
>
> > Further to this, how can we establish the 'virgin parts' box? I could
> > send it on as it is, with fewer parts, and people add their fair share
> > to it as it goes along.
>
> How are parts rattling about in a box affected by the gentle hands of our
> postal service? Would such a box need individual piece wrapping or
somesuch?
Do LEGO sets enjoy this protection?
No - therefore several zip-lock bags separating out large and small pieces
would be my suggestion.
New parts rattling loose in a box is to be avoided, I have to agree.
Huw
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: J box update - then there were Five!
|
| (...) I was aware of this potential problem. The bits I have are already in ziplock bags ready to go. If each person takes reasonable care to ensure they can't rattle about too much, all should be fine. Ian Bishop, Ayrshire, UK (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
Message is in Reply To:
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
