Subject:
|
J box update - then there were Five!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.uk
|
Date:
|
Sun, 26 Mar 2000 21:17:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4299 times
|
| |
|
|
Ian Bishop sent me a message that i thought I would share, he writes:
Rxed it (JB1) OK yesterday thanks. I have processed it in / out, but I'll not
have time to post it on until next week - I have to fly down to England
for a funeral this weekend.
Who is it to go to next, I'll need an address?
> Can whoever is next Please mail ian their address?
Actually, I have a proposal also. There were a small number of brand new
parts, but many of the other parts are less than perfect. My proposal is
to remove the brand new parts, supplement them with a large number of my
own new stuff, and create a new, 'virgin' J-box for new stuff only.
(Well, parts, instructions, literature, anything in vgc or mint
condition). Whaddya say? I don't mind administering its establishment
and progress to take some of the responsibility off you. Alternatively,
I thought about having a 'virgin' box plus a separate 'J-bag' for just
instructions. Hopefully this would move around much more quickly as
there would be less sorting involved. Lmk anyway.
> What does everyone think?
Whatever happens I'll not leave the old J-box short though.
> Regards,
Jason
--
MIME ATTACHMENTS DISCARDED:
1. Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Length: 2054
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: J box update - then there were Five!
|
| (...) Further to this, how can we establish the 'virgin parts' box? I could send it on as it is, with fewer parts, and people add their fair share to it as it goes along. Alternatively, all interested parties could mail me a few new parts to beef (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
