 | | Re: J box update - then there were Five! —Ian Bishop
|
| | | (...) Further to this, how can we establish the 'virgin parts' box? I could send it on as it is, with fewer parts, and people add their fair share to it as it goes along. Alternatively, all interested parties could mail me a few new parts to beef (...) (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: J box update - then there were Five! —Richard Franks
|
| | | | (...) How are parts rattling about in a box affected by the gentle hands of our postal service? Would such a box need individual piece wrapping or somesuch? Richard (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: J box update - then there were Five! —Huw Millington
|
| | | | Richard Franks <spontificus@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Fs6K5z.447@lugnet.com... (...) somesuch? Do LEGO sets enjoy this protection? No - therefore several zip-lock bags separating out large and small pieces would be my suggestion. New parts (...) (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: J box update - then there were Five! —Ian Bishop
|
| | | | (...) I was aware of this potential problem. The bits I have are already in ziplock bags ready to go. If each person takes reasonable care to ensure they can't rattle about too much, all should be fine. Ian Bishop, Ayrshire, UK (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| | | | |
