 | | Re: Anyone Fancy a Thames Valley Legofest? —Huw Millington
|
| | | Jon D Hayward <JonDHayward@Cableinet.co.uk> wrote in message news:FrF6qL.E7t@lugnet.com... (...) it (...) That's a good idea - perhaps on 50x50 baseplates (problems with curves notwithstanding) (...) line (...) around (...) bumpy... True... (...) (...) (25 years ago, 14-Mar-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Anyone Fancy a Thames Valley Legofest? —Jon D. Hayward
|
| | | | (...) I wasn't thinking of a modular approach, just of planning ahead as to how we could best use the given floor (table?!) area in order to have numerous trains running at any one time. Anyway, 50x50 are HTF now. 48x48 are common, but don't fit in (...) (25 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Anyone Fancy a Thames Valley Legofest? —Lawrence Wilkes
|
| | | | my little sketch for the hall (not found yet, but in my imagination, already has a solution to the table vs floor train layout debate. I had sketched both! As the floor area is always limited anyway, I had in mind a largish floor level 9v layout, (...) (25 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Anyone Fancy a Thames Valley Legofest? —Jason Briscoe
|
| | | | (...) Great, but where are all the tables coming from? would we need to bring our own? Regards, Jason (25 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| | | | |
