| |
In lugnet.general, lehman@javanet.com (Todd Lehman) writes:
> In lugnet.general, "Christian Gemuenden" <GECH1@t-online.de> writes:
> > as I just mentioned in a very very long e-mail, where does the information
> > of the Star Wars bucket 1886 come from? This information is also leaked,
> > copied from retailers information only and so against what we expect of TLC
> > wants published on lugnet.com
>
> I obtained that information and the set number in a phone call to LEGO
> Shop-At-Home and to LEGO Consumer Affairs. IIRC, I told them that I'd heard
> a rumor on the Internet that there was going to Star Wars bucket and I asked
> them to query their computer for any information about a "Star Wars bucket."
> The information that came back was that the set number was 1886, the name
> was "3+ bucket" (or something like that), and that it wasn't going to be
> available in the U.S. (this is all from memory...there's a post about it
> somewhere...)
Wait, no, that's not quite right. I stand corrected...I just checked the
RTL archive on Deja.com... Looks like I heard the set number first, and
-then- got more information from S@H, given the set number. I don't know if
I'd've gotten the set number from S@H all by itself, but I suppose that
becomes irrelevant once S@H gives out the full information to a perfect
stranger on the phone.
The number 1886 for the SW bucket came from a sheet which was dispatched to
retailers around the country by LSI in Enfield, giving a list of buckets
being discontinued. I asked my source if this was confidential information,
and he/she preferred to remain anonymous but added that it wasn't really
confidential, to the best of his/her knowledge. This same source has also
-not- repeated private information which he/she did believe was
confidential, so I have reason to believe it was correct.
--Todd
[followups to lugnet.starwars]
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000
|
| (...) [SNIP] (...) I hate to jump in on this one, but I think the scans were OK. As for retailer catalogs, what about set 6500???? It says in the Pause/Lugnet database, "In a 1996 UK retailers catalog, this set was announced to have been "Available (...) (27 years ago, 6-Dec-99, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000
|
| Chet Corbin <citeman@aol.com> wrote in message news:FMAz0B.CnK@lugnet.com... (...) retailer (...) "In a (...) you (...) I was the source of that 'leak'. It's in my 1996 retailers catalogue, but I didn't notice it until about 1998 (when I started (...) (27 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000
|
| (...) I obtained that information and the set number in a phone call to LEGO Shop-At-Home and to LEGO Consumer Affairs. IIRC, I told them that I'd heard a rumor on the Internet that there was going to Star Wars bucket and I asked them to query their (...) (27 years ago, 6-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.uk)
|
105 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
