| |
In lugnet.loc.au, Kerry Raymond writes:
> I think this might be a slightly heavy-weight organisation for the numbers
> of people involved!... • <snipped for space>
> Why not just start with LegOz for all Australia (and any of our neighbours
> who want to be involved)? If/when regional clusters of people find
> themselves getting together (either electronically through a lugnet group or
> in real-life), then consider forming a subgroup (e.g. Studs). I think that's
> a simpler and more organic approach than establishing a large hierarchy
> that's not sustainable.
Kerry makes lots of good points that I hadn't really though about and
I think she's right. I had realised that Tas would never make a LUG on
it's own but hadn't considered much further than hooking up with Vic.
Benjamin, do you think there's enough interest in Vic (and possibly
surrounding areas) to have a VicLug inside LegOz along with Studs
at the moment?
Either way, I really think we need to get the national group off the
ground in some form or other, expand the scope and membership bases
as we go along. It doesn't have to be too formal at this stage, just
so long as we're in general agreement and can figure out some common
goals to justify its existence (things which Pete W and Benjamin have
covered in other posts to some extent).
Deidre
drb@tasmail.com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
