Subject:
|
Re: Train layout ideas for future Ontario/Canada train shows
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.ca.on
|
Date:
|
Wed, 10 May 2006 19:18:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
7846 times
|
| |
 | |
In lugnet.loc.ca.on, C. L. GunningCook wrote:
|
And for what its worth, I like going with the Can-Brick or
CLBA - Canadian LEGO Brick Association. Although since there are active
lugs in other provinces... maybe OLBA (you can even say it as a word,
giggle) Ontario Lego Brick Association would be better. In fact I would even
like to make up official train container cars once we decide, if that is
permissible to you.
|
CanBrick should not be taken by a single area club, IMO. (Victoria speaks up!)
|
One final thought for now... I like the addition to adding the curved
modules... but I do think if we go that route, we need one sole person
responsible for both mods, therefore if they dont show, we can go with the
straight route.
|
Not too important, as long as it is known in advance that the module is not
going to show up. It is perfectly possible to have a L shaped layout. Not sure
if any of you will remember seeing St Albans, a finescale OO layout, but it
reguarly showed as a L shape, even though now it is U shaped. (I think it was
easier to run as a L than a U, because I kept running into the other
operator...). The other thing is that if the baseplate level is used as 0, then
it will be easy enough to cobble together a curve module, literally on the fly.
(PNLTC stylin)
James Powell
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
8 Messages in This Thread:     
      
      
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|