To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.loc.ca.bc.vicOpen lugnet.loc.ca.bc.vic in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Local / Canada / British Columbia / Victoria / 47
46  |  48
Subject: 
Re: rocket powered LEGO vehicle
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.loc.ca.bc.vic
Date: 
Wed, 24 Nov 1999 20:40:44 GMT
Viewed: 
5774 times
  
James... try

http://www.webcom.com/legacysy/convert2/convert_old.html


James Powell wrote in message ...
> 
> > As James said, a longer burn might best.  The majority of the energy might
> > be spent breaking the momentum of rest.  In a several gram cardboard tube
> > not as big problem, lego vehicle (LV)... substancial problem.  One
> > suggestion might be engaging the engine after the LV has started moving. • I
> > am thinking of some sort of incline that the LV would roll down  (two of
> > those Hot Wheel tracks maybe?) and the engine would be engaged once the LV
> > hit the flat (moving).  This could incorporate the MS in a neat way; • sensing
> > when the engine should be engaged rather than just engaing it... touch
> > sensor tripped, light beam broken, excetera.
> > 
> > The engery equivilant of, Randy lifting the LV to the top of an incline,
> > might be _several_ engines, depending on the mass of the LV.
> 
> No, the engines have a fair amount of energy.  I will have to go and dig up • my
> sheets on the engines...(goes away, comes back soon)
> 
> First off, some physics.
> 
> Ep=MGH
> 
> Ek=1/2 mv^2 (thats V squared)
> 
> Where,
> 
> Ep= Potential Energy (gravity)
> Ek= Energy to get something to a speed (Energy Kinetic)  Both in J
> M=Mass (in kg)
> G=9.8 (gravity)
> H=Hight
> V=Velocity
> 
> Now, taking a look at my handy ESTES catalog, the motor I am suggesting has • a
> rating of
> C-5-3  Total Impulse=10 N/S
> Delay 3 sec
> Max Thrust 5 Lb
> Thrust Duration 2.1 Sec
> (average thrust is 4.76 N, appiled for 2.1 sec)
> (this is a very peaked graph, if you look at it it is like v- upside down)
> 
> Now, if only I could find the conversion from N/S to J, then I could go and • do
> some calculations.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > As to the LV itself;  four or three wheels might produce better initial
> > reuslts.
> 
> Three, because then your friction is reduced.
> 
> 
> > Doesn't the Extream Team have a rocket car?  That might be a cool
> > conversion.  Other things I was thinking about... rear wheels behind • thrust
> > point; slight downward thrust rather that upward; I think that engines • have
> > a thrust value that could be used to calculate approximently, if you were
> > looking at launching a ABS projectile capable of penatrateing steel, or • just
> > zipping across a parking lot :).
> 
> Yep.  I don't think that we are in danger of breaking the speed of sound • with
> this one though...
> 
> James



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: rocket powered LEGO vehicle
 
(...) No, the engines have a fair amount of energy. I will have to go and dig up my sheets on the engines...(goes away, comes back soon) First off, some physics. Ep=MGH Ek=1/2 mv^2 (thats V squared) Where, Ep= Potential Energy (gravity) Ek= Energy (...) (27 years ago, 24-Nov-99, to lugnet.loc.ca.bc.vic)

3 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR