Subject:
|
Re: Re Shop at home...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.ca
|
Date:
|
Thu, 16 Dec 1999 05:13:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
704 times
|
| |
|
|
I did not mean to imply that S@H Canada will not be closing. I have read
the discussion and understand that.
It just seemed to me that there might be some confusion about the wording on
the in-box mini catalogs. I was just trying to eliminate confusion
regarding Lego Direct Marketing versus the upcoming LegoDirect service.
Kevin Salm
Tony Jang wrote in message ...
>
> If the debate is about whether or not S@H Canada is closing, it's not a
> debate. It was first mentioned on RTL many months ago and when I placed an
> order soon afterwards, I confirmed it with the rep I was speaking with.
>
> TJ
>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Re Shop at home...
|
| Kevin Salm <kdsalm@dreamscape.com> wrote in message news:FMtI8z.Gpp@lugnet.com... (...) on (...) Oops sorry! For me the possible name change is trivial. I just assumed you meant the S@H Canada closing. "Don't assume, cause you'll make an..." ;-) TJ (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.ca)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Re Shop at home...
|
| Kevin Salm <kdsalm@dreamscape.com> wrote in message news:FMtHCn.ELp@lugnet.com... (...) [big cut] (...) If the debate is about whether or not S@H Canada is closing, it's not a debate. It was first mentioned on RTL many months ago and when I placed (...) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.ca)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
