 | | Re: Re Shop at home...
|
|
(...) Ya, you should not get hit with the PST if it is being shipped out of province. (except if in Atlantic Canada...) If it is being shipped from Ontario to BC, then the only tax payable is the GST . You are responsible for paying the BC sales tax (...) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.ca, lugnet.loc.ca.bc)
|
| |
| | Re: Re Shop at home...
|
|
Tony Jang wrote in message ... (...) from (...) My theory if anyone wants to hear it is that Chpaters would be required to collect PST on any items because the store maintains a physical presence ( I assume there must be a store somewhere) In BC. (...) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.ca, lugnet.loc.ca.bc)
|
| |
| | Re: Re Shop at home...
|
|
Kevin Salm <kdsalm@dreamscape.com> wrote in message news:FMtI8z.Gpp@lugnet.com... (...) on (...) Oops sorry! For me the possible name change is trivial. I just assumed you meant the S@H Canada closing. "Don't assume, cause you'll make an..." ;-) TJ (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.ca)
|
| |
| | Re: Re Shop at home...
|
|
I did not mean to imply that S@H Canada will not be closing. I have read the discussion and understand that. It just seemed to me that there might be some confusion about the wording on the in-box mini catalogs. I was just trying to eliminate (...) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.ca)
|
| |
| | Re: Re Shop at home...
|
|
Kevin Salm <kdsalm@dreamscape.com> wrote in message news:FMtHCn.ELp@lugnet.com... (...) [big cut] (...) If the debate is about whether or not S@H Canada is closing, it's not a debate. It was first mentioned on RTL many months ago and when I placed (...) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.ca)
|
| |
| | Re: Re Shop at home...
|
|
Also, I dialed all of the different phone numbers listed and they all go right to Shop @ Home.... So, evidence tells me that LDM is just S@H renamed for the in-box mini catalogs. The phone numbers, physical addresses, and prices are identical. Kevin (...) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.ca)
|
| |
| | Re: Re Shop at home...
|
|
John Battcock wrote in message ... (...) number (...) us. I do not have information about S@H Canada closing, but it sounds like it could have some good and bad results. Anyway, I just wanted to say that on the mini-catalog for this year seen (...) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.ca)
|
| |
| | Re: Re Shop at home...
|
|
(...) Every order I've had from S@H (some of which have indeed been large) has had GST but not PST. This is a good thing, since Alberta doesn't have a PST. :) James (URL) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.ca, lugnet.loc.ca.bc)
|
| |
| | Re: Re Shop at home...
|
|
Bryan Wong <green_paper@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:FMtFLn.71w@lugnet.com... (...) the (...) that (...) Probably not. I'm thinking the BC "government" probably has put a minimum PST amount they are willing to collect. Like say $20. So, I'd be (...) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.ca, lugnet.loc.ca.bc)
|
| |
| | Re: Shutting Down?
|
|
(...) It's being amalgamated with S@H US, and a whole bunch of other stuff and getting called LEGO Direct(1). The bottom line for us is that we now call the same number as US folks. James (URL) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.loc.ca)
|
