|
|
 | | Re: The Well traveled Maniac
|
| "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:FyqtvE.8F0@lugnet.com... (...) say (...) that (...) together (...) So guys, do you think we should get together for a 2000.6? (...) ye gods! It's one of the poshest hotels in Sydney. (...) (24 years ago, 4-Aug-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.loc.au.nsw.syd)
| | | | | Re: Should we surrender?
|
| surrender? Later, James (...) (24 years ago, 27-Jul-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.loc.au.act.can, lugnet.loc.au.nsw.new, lugnet.loc.au.nsw.syd, lugnet.loc.au.nt.als, lugnet.loc.au.nt.dar, lugnet.loc.au.qld.bri, lugnet.loc.au.qld.bun, lugnet.loc.au.qld.cai, lugnet.loc.au.qld.goc, lugnet.loc.au.qld.mac, lugnet.loc.au.qld.mis, lugnet.loc.au.qld.roc, lugnet.loc.au.qld.too, lugnet.loc.au.qld.tow, lugnet.loc.au.sa.ade, lugnet.loc.au.tas.hob, lugnet.loc.au.vic.mel, lugnet.loc.au.wa.alb, lugnet.loc.au.wa.bun, lugnet.loc.au.wa.ger, lugnet.loc.au.wa.hed, lugnet.loc.au.wa.kal, lugnet.loc.au.wa.per, lugnet.org.au)
| | | | | RE: Should we surrender?
|
| 'Tis a pity really..although it also keeps those italians honest, as they can't use this idea, either :) [and I believe they have more sub-groups, too.] Benjamin Whytcross BWhytcro@PacificAccess.com.au Ph: (03) 9856 5282 Directory Technology Pty Ltd (...) (24 years ago, 27-Jul-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.loc.au.act.can, lugnet.loc.au.nsw.new, lugnet.loc.au.nsw.syd, lugnet.loc.au.nt.als, lugnet.loc.au.nt.dar, lugnet.loc.au.qld.bri, lugnet.loc.au.qld.bun, lugnet.loc.au.qld.cai, lugnet.loc.au.qld.goc, lugnet.loc.au.qld.mac, lugnet.loc.au.qld.mis, lugnet.loc.au.qld.roc, lugnet.loc.au.qld.too, lugnet.loc.au.qld.tow, lugnet.loc.au.sa.ade, lugnet.loc.au.tas.hob, lugnet.loc.au.vic.mel, lugnet.loc.au.wa.alb, lugnet.loc.au.wa.bun, lugnet.loc.au.wa.ger, lugnet.loc.au.wa.hed, lugnet.loc.au.wa.kal, lugnet.loc.au.wa.per, lugnet.org.au)
| | | | | Re: Should we surrender?
|
| (...) 2842 (web interface in local hierarchy). B*mmer. Deidre drb@tasmail.com (24 years ago, 27-Jul-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.loc.au.act.can, lugnet.loc.au.nsw.new, lugnet.loc.au.nsw.syd, lugnet.loc.au.nt.als, lugnet.loc.au.nt.dar, lugnet.loc.au.qld.bri, lugnet.loc.au.qld.bun, lugnet.loc.au.qld.cai, lugnet.loc.au.qld.goc, lugnet.loc.au.qld.mac, lugnet.loc.au.qld.mis, lugnet.loc.au.qld.roc, lugnet.loc.au.qld.too, lugnet.loc.au.qld.tow, lugnet.loc.au.sa.ade, lugnet.loc.au.tas.hob, lugnet.loc.au.vic.mel, lugnet.loc.au.wa.alb, lugnet.loc.au.wa.bun, lugnet.loc.au.wa.ger, lugnet.loc.au.wa.hed, lugnet.loc.au.wa.kal, lugnet.loc.au.wa.per, lugnet.org.au)
| | | | | Re: Should we surrender?
|
| (...) Not all, I'm still here, oh maybe that's it, have I scared everyone off? :) (...) Does that actually help or does only 1 count? ok, before this is was 2841. Deidre drb@tasmail.com (24 years ago, 27-Jul-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.loc.au.act.can, lugnet.loc.au.nsw.new, lugnet.loc.au.nsw.syd, lugnet.loc.au.nt.als, lugnet.loc.au.nt.dar, lugnet.loc.au.qld.bri, lugnet.loc.au.qld.bun, lugnet.loc.au.qld.cai, lugnet.loc.au.qld.goc, lugnet.loc.au.qld.mac, lugnet.loc.au.qld.mis, lugnet.loc.au.qld.roc, lugnet.loc.au.qld.too, lugnet.loc.au.qld.tow, lugnet.loc.au.sa.ade, lugnet.loc.au.tas.hob, lugnet.loc.au.vic.mel, lugnet.loc.au.wa.alb, lugnet.loc.au.wa.bun, lugnet.loc.au.wa.ger, lugnet.loc.au.wa.hed, lugnet.loc.au.wa.kal, lugnet.loc.au.wa.per, lugnet.org.au)
| | | | | RE: Should we surrender?
|
| The problem, as I see it is that all the lurkers who popped up for the roll-calls seem to have returned to lurking....Come on you guys, we need your help. [And if there's anyone else lurking out there, please let us know you're there.] And to help, (...) (24 years ago, 27-Jul-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.loc.au.act.can, lugnet.loc.au.nsw.new, lugnet.loc.au.nsw.syd, lugnet.loc.au.nt.als, lugnet.loc.au.nt.dar, lugnet.loc.au.qld.bri, lugnet.loc.au.qld.bun, lugnet.loc.au.qld.cai, lugnet.loc.au.qld.goc, lugnet.loc.au.qld.mac, lugnet.loc.au.qld.mis, lugnet.loc.au.qld.roc, lugnet.loc.au.qld.too, lugnet.loc.au.qld.tow, lugnet.loc.au.sa.ade, lugnet.loc.au.tas.hob, lugnet.loc.au.vic.mel, lugnet.loc.au.wa.alb, lugnet.loc.au.wa.bun, lugnet.loc.au.wa.ger, lugnet.loc.au.wa.hed, lugnet.loc.au.wa.kal, lugnet.loc.au.wa.per, lugnet.org.au)
| | | | | Re: LegOz 2000.5
|
| "Peter White" <aztekium@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message news:FyA0M0.GK2@lugnet.com... (...) 'In the wild'? Are you crazy? Few people have met a 5571 in the wild, and survived the experience. It's the largest lego set ever produced, and you think (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.loc.au.nsw.syd)
| | | | | Re: LegOz 2000.5
|
| (...) i wouldn't mind seeing a 5571 'in the wild' (seeing it's assembled) pete.w <aquanaut@optusnet.com.au> (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.loc.au.nsw.syd)
| | | | | Re: LegOz 2000.5
|
| "James Howse" <jehowse@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Fy9Eo8.6zH@lugnet.com... (...) and (...) plain, (...) I'll be bringing along two 8480's. Main and alternate model. Are there any other technic models that people would like to see? Tell me (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.loc.au.nsw.syd)
| | | | | (canceled)
|
| |
|
