Subject:
|
Re: Valueations for Insurance
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 14:15:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
325 times
|
| |
|
|
"Benjamin Whytcross" <b_whytcross@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:H049sz.CzJ@lugnet.com...
>
> Actually, according to the RACV, you're best to just bung it in under
> general contents, as there doesn't seem to be many people who want to • insure
> it as a collection...to most people it's just a kids toy.
That's what I did... as it happened, I only bothered declaring what I had
reciepts for - although that was the majority of my collection. It would
make it heaps easier come claim time though. It also makes an interesting
(sometimes scary) record of one's Lego spending... :-)
Now, if only LUGNET set lists:
1. allowed you to assign arbitrary monetary values to the sets in your list,
2. were in a spreadsheet-friendly format, or
3. were as XML rather than whatever weird-arse layout they seem to be in.
Ah well, maybe one day.
--
Cheers,
Paul
LUGNET member 164
http://www.geocities.com/doctorshnub/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
3 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
