Subject:
|
Re: We should draft an "official" letter to Lego Australia
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Fri, 26 May 2000 04:37:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
370 times
|
| |
|
|
Yeah this is sounding much better, and thats the idea, to get everyones
thoughts about something like this.
I will say this though in case it didn't sound clear earlier. I didn't want LA
receiveing a letter which nitpicks or starts requesting that they get their
acto together immediately. Although we all feel they could do better, its
important to develop a repoire with them before we start suggesting how they
should do their own business.
That is why I only wanted the letter to be just to see if they'd recognise us,
nod their heads and say "right we're with you" or they might turn around and
say "all we do is import and distribute sets, nothing more".
If we start advising them and start picking on them right away, they'll never
cooperate with us until they can understand that we want to help the situation
for everyone.
Santosh
(who's now put in 4c worth)
In lugnet.loc.au, David Low writes:
> In lugnet.loc.au, Santosh Bhat has a great suggestion:
> > Now that there seems to be fair sizeable number of people and ideas floating
> > around loc.au, how does the idea of writing to Lego Australia sound?
> >
> > What I was thinking was just an official letter byways to notify LA about our
> > existence, that is the LegOz existence. And to also inform them about how we
> > came about though the Lugnet.
> >
> > We could ask how LA feels about this and whether they'd be willing to support
> > such events.
> >
> > We could also let them know that we use Lugnet as a forum for
> > discussions/grievences/comments about Lego and its availability. The idea • here
> > is not to let them know specifically about any of these comments but to point
> > out to them where these are in case they'd like to go searching for them.
> > Maybe once they are aware of us and Lugnet, and if they give us support then
> > we can start hitting them with out grievences and comments.
> >
> > I'm proposing this approach as it's rather a way of slowly approaching and
> > asking for support and building a healthy relationship with them, rather than
> > hammering them immediately.
>
>
> Here's my rewrite of Santosh's draft, including Ben's suggestions. I've put
> changes in square brackets and preceded new material with asterisks, so if
> Santosh wrote "something like this", I've written "something *else [like this]
> {and extra comments go in curly braces}".
>
> -----------------
>
> Dear Lego Australia
>
> This letter is to *inform you of [notify you about] a group of enthusiasts
> forming a Lego club known as LegOz. We have come together *through [by means
> of] an Internet discussion forum *hosted at [called] Lugnet (available at
> http://www.lugnet.com/loc/au/ ). *In this forum we discuss favorite themes,
> sets from the current range and our own creations; essentially, everything
> Lego.
>
> *Currently LegOz comprises {how ever many of us put their names to this
> letter}, from all over Australia. *Most of us still have our Lego from our
> childhood collection {can someone think of a better phrase?}, and many of us
> are raising a new generation in a house full of bricks. *Many members of LegOz
> have large personal collections, the inevitable result of enthusiasm for Lego
> and an adult income. *We keep a close eye on product release dates, store
> discounts, and developments overseas, such as the proposed LegoDirect in the
> United States.
>
>
> We have *held [hosted] events and meetings to express our interests in Lego
> (some publicly), *and we expect to continue to do so. LegOz would like to know
> how you feel about *our [such a] group and if you support such initiatives.
> *We would also be keen to participate in your promotions, such as building
> events and {the truck show -- does it have a formal name?}, on a volunteer
> basis (or we could always be paid in bricks!).
>
> {PeteW, how's it looking with TRU (or was it W4K?) Penrith? Would they be
> willing to break open a few sets for us to demonstrate with?}
>
> We hope to have future dealings and discussions directly with our local Lego
> *distributor [authority], *Lego Australia [yourselves].
>
> regards,
> LegOz
> {names, email addresses, world club numbers (if members)}
>
> ----------------------
>
> Anyone/everyone who's interested, please rewrite this as you/we see fit.
>
> Great idea Santosh.
>
> -- Dave L.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: We should draft an "official" letter to Lego Australia
|
| In lugnet.loc.au, Santosh Bhat has a great suggestion: (...) Here's my rewrite of Santosh's draft, including Ben's suggestions. I've put changes in square brackets and preceded new material with asterisks, so if Santosh wrote "something like this", (...) (24 years ago, 26-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
