 | | Re: SALE PRICES [inc. 6975 fo $35 AUS]
|
|
(...) A horse, a bush, even a snake I think. (...) Hey, I have one already, I just try not to look at it. (Completists will go to any depths...) pete.w (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | RE: SALE PRICES [inc. 6975 fo $35 AUS]
|
|
(...) That's right....They had 39 of them Yesterday ! [I doubt there's that many now however :) ] Also, I've got to agree with the 6150 description, although it won't stop me getting one at that price. Benjamin Whytcross (...) (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: SALE PRICES [inc. 6975 fo $35 AUS]
|
|
(...) That 6150 is one ugly set. Dave Low, you there 6709's $3. pete.w (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Australian Roll Call
|
|
"Rachel Kingston" <kingston@spirit.com.au> wrote in message news:Fv0F1F.F4H@lugnet.com... (...) competant (...) The 1.5 set has a few cool technic parts that 1 hasn't, and is minus a couple of very ordinary parts. It's also got an upgraded (...) (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Australian Standards for LEGO
|
|
"Peter Callaway" <pcallaway@bmcl.com.au> wrote in message news:Fv098q.Lxp@lugnet.com... (...) moving (...) suppliment (...) Argh! I got 4100 and 1170 confused *starts self-flagelation with birch sticks* Bah, I've been studying too much mining (...) (25 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
