To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.loc.auOpen lugnet.loc.au in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Local / Australia / 7552
  Re: train track prservation
 
(...) (gives in to the inevitable) My goodness that's a rather large chip you're carrying on your shoulder, isn't it? Until you foamed the only US post in this thread was one intended to be helpful. (23 years ago, 23-Oct-01, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: train track prservation
 
(...) Hmm. Do you mean this: (URL) I'm missing a joke about the cleanliness of Michael's house, it looks more rude than "helpful". If you don't understand why, let me know and I shall explain. Scott A (More of a "Jock" than a "Seppo") (23 years ago, 23-Oct-01, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: train track prservation
 
(...) Now now! I Think Benjamin was referring to someone sniping about the "p" word rather than Larry's light-hearted comment about mud and cleanliness. Quite amusing I thought, and I'm sure no offence was taken. Let's not get worked up over this (...) (23 years ago, 23-Oct-01, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: train track prservation
 
In lugnet.loc.au, Peter Callaway writes: <snip> In one of the previous threads on track dirtiness that Michael started, he said he lives by the sea. We don't keep a particularly clean house, we get dust and mud all over it, all the time. We have (...) (23 years ago, 23-Oct-01, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: train track prservation
 
(...) I'm not trying to cause "trouble" Larry. I was just stating that I thought your message was more rude than helpful, and I still do despite your squirming. If you want to continue bickering over this Larry, reply to this message somewhere (...) (23 years ago, 23-Oct-01, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: train track prservation
 
(...) That's an issue with your reading comprehension, not the message. (...) When someone catches you in a lie, pointing it out is "bickering", apparently. That's another lie. This "bickering" characterisation is the same lie you used to try to (...) (23 years ago, 23-Oct-01, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: train track prservation
 
(...) ...and were readers supposed to know that? Were readers supposed to check Michael's every post? Why not mention it in your post? (...) Well, that's nothing to brag about. (...) This is not about your track. (...) Interesting. I can see a salty (...) (23 years ago, 23-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR