 | | Re: Thanks... —Paul Baulch
| | | | Benjamin Whytcross wrote in message ... (...) near (...) This wasn't due to that minor problem with the replies not threading properly? Surely not. I mean, it doesn't cause any real problems, and nobody would be so anal-retentive as to complain to (...) (24 years ago, 17-Oct-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Thanks... —Sue Ann Barber
| | | | | | (...) We're all too busy building, planning our christmas Lego wish list, writing horrendous criteria based job applications and buying houses. Or maybe that was just me :) cheers sue ann (who's only online so her brain can process ideas in the (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Thanks... —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | (...) They haven't been revoked. Only the broken tool itself has been banned, and it applies to anyone that uses it. Benjamin, me, you, anybody, any time of day or night. (...) Did you want to start that row all over again somewhere else? There are (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | |
