To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.loc.auOpen lugnet.loc.au in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Local / Australia / 3029
3028  |  3030
Subject: 
Re: When is Lego actually considered old?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.loc.au
Date: 
Thu, 21 Sep 2000 16:03:54 GMT
Viewed: 
421 times
  
One of my preschool lego memories (1964) when all I had was white and red
bricks, was that many of the red bricks were a "lighter" red, and they never
gripped well (and they were new then)...many of my models just fell apart or
collapsed--anyone else remember the faded red 2x4's?



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: When is Lego actually considered old?
 
(...) It's not possible to answer your question because the term "old" is a subjective term -- entirely dependent upon your frame of reference. To you maybe ten years ago is old, to me it might mean something from before I was born (say from the (...) (24 years ago, 20-Sep-00, to lugnet.loc.au)

8 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR