Subject:
|
When is Lego actually considered old?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Wed, 20 Sep 2000 09:59:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
439 times
|
| |
|
|
Hello,
This is something that goes around alot, but I have been caught in the flow! I
have been tricked twice with the internet in buying, with so called OLD LEGO
SETS. I was thinking the 70's and 80's but I am sure you could help me to get
a better understanding, using old in terms of Lego is very broad. Sometimes my
friends say old but it just ends up being a 96 or 97 set just a bit dusty.
Regards,
James
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: When is Lego actually considered old?
|
| (...) It's not possible to answer your question because the term "old" is a subjective term -- entirely dependent upon your frame of reference. To you maybe ten years ago is old, to me it might mean something from before I was born (say from the (...) (24 years ago, 20-Sep-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | Re: When is Lego actually considered old?
|
| James Ng wrote in message ... (...) flow! I (...) LEGO (...) get (...) my (...) Do you want "old" Lego because it might be valuable, useful for selling or trading? If so, then I find that going by theme and set size is better than simply by age. (...) (24 years ago, 22-Sep-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
