Subject:
|
Re: LegOz 2000.7 in Melbourne and LegOz 2000.8 in Sydney
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au
|
Date:
|
Thu, 14 Sep 2000 05:44:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1135 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.loc.au, David Drew writes:
> A possible alternate method might be to use the state's area code as a
> prefix, like the phone numbers.
>
> Ie, LegOz [year].[state code].[event number]
>
> NSW would use LegOz 2001.2.1, 2001.2.2, etc.
> Vic would use Legoz 2001.3.1.
> The other states can use their respective numbers.
>
> Does this mess up the Taswegians? I can't remember if they use the same code
> as Vic.
Yes, we've (Tas) got the same phone area code as Vic now. Plus I'd be forever
looking up codes to see who was doing what. How about:
LegOz Tas 2001.1
LegOz Vic 2001.1
etc, within a state different areas could co-ordinate their number scheme with
each other like we're doing now eg
LegOz NSW 2000.1 (Sydney)
LegOz NSW 2000.2 (Sydney)
LegOz NSW 2000.3 (Somewhere else in NSW, I'm geographically challenged!)
LegOz NSW 2000.4 (Sydney)
I'm not sure if I actually like this or not, just thinking out loud.
Any more ideas out there?
Deidre
drb@tasmail.com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
10 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
