 | | Re: Australian Ambassadors - nominations/voting —Kerry Raymond
|
| | | Jeez Louise! Can you guys all learn to, like, read?! The rules are these: What should a nomination have in it? a.. Name and age of the nominee. b.. Where is the nominee from? c.. Which Group does this nominee represent? d.. Does this person consent (...) (17 years ago, 8-May-08, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Australian Ambassadors - nominations/voting —Bob Parker
|
| | | | | (...) I assume you meant this as a rhetorical question... (17 years ago, 8-May-08, to lugnet.loc.au, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Australian Ambassadors - nominations/voting —Allister McLaren
|
| | | | | (...) Aw, go and spoil the joke, why don't you. The frenzy of 'nominations' has been a source of much mirth. I nominate Kerry. Al (17 years ago, 9-May-08, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Australian Ambassadors - nominations/voting —Peter Parsons
|
| | | | | | (...) Good Buddy Kerry has allready informed all the right people that she does not want to be nominated and if you read the rules again you should have asked her first before you published your big words!! As for "Mirth" I have said another phrase (...) (17 years ago, 9-May-08, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Australian Ambassadors - nominations/voting —Allister McLaren
|
| | | | | | | (...) It was a joke, Peter. Are you familiar with the concept at all? (...) No surpsrises there, you sad little man. (...) DGAF. (17 years ago, 9-May-08, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Australian Ambassadors - nominations/voting —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | | | (...) Out of interest who are the 'right people'? (...) If you read the words carefully you'd notice that this isn't a formal nomination. (...) I have a suspicion the other sites think it's all rather amusing if they think anything of it at all. I (...) (17 years ago, 9-May-08, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Australian Ambassadors - nominations/voting —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | --snip-- (...) --snip-- (...) The 'up to 3 people' part of the rules is why I started this thread. I hoped to insure that there would be three candidates who could act on Australia-specific issues were they selected. Tim (17 years ago, 9-May-08, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | | |
