 | | Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK?
|
| (...) What's changed is that TLC believes (perhaps correctly, perhaps not) that kids nowadays have short attention spans, and will not be interested in building a big, complex set over, say, watching TV or playing the computer. (...) Yep, that's (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK?
|
| (...) Argh! Having just said the road plates were not Lego, I took a closer look at the next picture and they are Lego after all, studs and all. Oh well, I never saw anything so sophisticated here in Australia in my childhood. Kerry (24 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK?
|
| (...) Yeah, when I checked out the 1965 catalogue on BenW's suggestion I saw the "Town Layout" kit with the road plates and instructions for building the structures IIRC. Oh to have been around in those "glory years" (without trying to sound (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK?
|
| "Peter Callaway" <pcallaway@bmcl.com.au> wrote in message news:FwFss9.Cxv@lugnet.com... (...) puzzle (...) This is the view that most people have of thesis students, who spend a whole year doing a single task. :) Excuse me, I haven't done anything (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
| |
